CheckOps home

Tools directory

H

CheckOps

Hamming

Hamming tests, red-teams and monitors voice and chat AI agents: simulated calls before launch, failed calls rerun as regression tests, and production monitoring.

Visit website

Latest public signals

Not refreshed yet. Refresh reads the public site and, when the entry has a GitHub repository, the latest release.

Visit Website

Introduction

Hamming calls itself “the security layer for voice and chat agents”. The official site describes three stages: test before launch, red-team what could go wrong, and monitor every production call.

Before launch, agents are red-teamed against prompt injection, jailbreaks and social engineering. On every release, failed calls are rerun as regression tests. In production, every call is monitored for leaks and policy breaks. The site lists SOC 2 Type II, a HIPAA BAA and GDPR DPA, SSO, RBAC and single-tenant deployment.

Features

  1. Simulated calls: Automated test callers exercise voice agents.
  2. Red teaming: Prompt injection, jailbreak and social-engineering probes.
  3. Regression from failures: Failed calls become regression tests.
  4. Production monitoring: Every call checked for leaks and policy breaks, with alerts.
  5. Scale: The site cites 10K+ voice agents tested and 50K+ concurrent test calls; vendor figures.
  6. Enterprise security: SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA BAA, SSO, single-tenant option.

Pros

  1. Voice-specific: Purpose-built for phone and voice agents.
  2. Closes the loop: Production failures feed regression tests.
  3. Security focus: Red teaming is core, not an add-on.
  4. Compliance: Healthcare-ready options.
  5. Human agreement: Claims 95%+ agreement with human evaluators; vendor figure.

Cons

  1. No public pricing: Demo-led; see site.
  2. Narrow scope: Voice and chat agents only.
  3. Hosted service: Calls and recordings flow through Hamming.
  4. Vendor metrics: Scale and accuracy figures are self-reported.
  5. Simulations cost: Large concurrent call tests are a paid service.

Request a demo, connect your voice or chat agent’s phone number or endpoint, define scenarios and personas, run simulated calls, and turn failures into regression tests. Enable production monitoring to alert on leaks and policy breaks.

Resources:

Pricing

Hamming does not publish prices. See site or request a demo.

  1. Teams launching voice agents in support, healthcare or finance.
  2. Security and compliance teams responsible for conversational AI.
  3. Product teams wanting regression tests from real failed calls.
  4. Not a fit for non-conversational apps.

Conclusion

Hamming focuses on testing and securing voice and chat agents across launch, release and production.

Its value is highest where a single bad call carries real risk.

Alternatives

Other tools on CheckOps that cover similar ground. Open a page, or compare one with Hamming side by side.