ZeroPath

Visit Website

Introduction

ZeroPath offers agentic security for cloud, hybrid and on-prem apps, finding and fixing exploitable vulnerabilities across code, AI, dependencies, infrastructure and runtime. It claims to find 2x more vulnerabilities with 75% fewer false positives than traditional SAST.

Users quoted on the site highlight business logic vulnerabilities as most of the important issues it finds. Its newest feature is automated application threat modelling.

The best way to judge ZeroPath is a side-by-side run against your current SAST on the same repositories. Count how many findings each tool raises, how many your engineers agree are real, and how many include a usable fix. Those three numbers usually settle the decision faster than any feature list.

Features

1. AI-native SAST: Contextual static analysis.
2. Business logic findings: Beyond pattern rules.
3. Dependencies and infra: Broad coverage.
4. Threat modelling: Automated.
5. Auto-fix: Patch suggestions.

Pros

1. Researcher access: Free for independent security research.

Cons

1. Price: $1,000 a month plus $60 per developer.

Usage and Links (Example)

1. Connect repositories.
2. Review findings and threat models.
3. Enable PR checks.

Resources:

• ZeroPath website

Pricing

ZeroPath lists $1,000 a month plus $60 per developer, with free access for independent security research.

Recommended for?

1. AppSec teams replacing noisy SAST.

Conclusion

ZeroPath is a strong AI SAST option with business-logic depth.

Benchmark it against your existing scanner on the same repos.

On CheckOps, ZeroPath is filed under the Security testing and Release & CI gates stages. Related tools listed here include Semgrep, Snyk, CodeQL, Checkmarx, Veracode and SonarQube. A short trial on a real project, with your own code, data and pipeline, is usually the fastest way to choose between them, because fit matters more than feature lists. Facts here come from the official site, documentation and repository, checked on 11 November 2026.